Both directives become effective on 7 December, but affected operators face different planning constraints: estimated maintenance effort for certain 787s and dual time-based limits for DA40-family aircraft.
Certain Boeing 787 variants are subject to a directive carrying an estimated 34 labour-hours and $2,890 per aircraft for inspection and adhesion checks. DA40-family operators must amend flight manuals and perform first inspections by the earlier of 100 flying hours or 100 days. Operators should therefore plan against aircraft-specific inputs rather than treat the common effective date as a common compliance schedule.
The 7 December effective date creates two distinct decisions: 787 operators must provision for a quantified inspection workload, while DA40 operators must fit documentation and inspection actions within whichever utilisation or calendar limit arrives first.
Quantified workload for affected 787s
The 787 measure covers certain -8, -9 and -10 aircraft. The regulator estimates that the prescribed inspections and adhesion checks will require around 34 labour-hours and cost $2,890 for each aeroplane. It identifies the underlying hazard as possible ignition within a fuel tank, with an explosion risk if lightning strikes.
An affected operator’s immediate decision is how much maintenance resource to reserve for this defined scope. The FAA estimate provides a planning baseline, not evidence of each operator’s eventual labour use or expenditure. Recorded completion effort and cost would determine whether that initial allocation needs revising.
DA40 timing depends on two limits
For DA40-family aircraft, flight manuals must be amended and first inspections completed by the earlier of 100 flying hours or 100 days. The measure covers an estimated 987 aircraft on the US register and also calls for revised procedures and corrective measures addressing possible faults in door latching.
Operators must monitor both elapsed time and aircraft use: a busier aeroplane may reach the hourly limit before the calendar limit. The scheduling trade-off is therefore specific—preserve planned flying while ensuring the required actions are completed before the controlling threshold. The safety consequence identified by the regulator is door separation causing structural damage and potentially loss of control.
Watch next
- 787 completion effort
Operator-recorded labour hours and expenditure compared with the FAA’s per-aircraft estimates.
- DA40 controlling threshold
Which aircraft approach the flying-hour limit before the calendar limit, and whether manual amendments and first inspections are completed accordingly.
- Door-latching actions
Completion of the revised procedures and corrective measures required for affected DA40-family aircraft.
Sources & further reading
- FAA orders inspections of certain Boeing 787 fuel-tank sealant installationsavweb.com ↗
- FAA orders inspections for Diamond DA40-family aircraftavweb.com ↗
- Wizz Air flight makes unscheduled Budapest stop after bomb threataero.de ↗
- Learjet 60 crashes in Florida, killing nineaviationpros.com ↗
- Perth Airport reveals New Terminal concept designsairport-world.com ↗
- Perth Airport reveals New Terminal concept designsaviationpros.com ↗
- Ryanair reports first-half profit declineaerotime.aero ↗
- DOT postpones revised disruption-reporting rulesaviation.direct ↗
- Embraer adjusts ADS exchange ratio on NYSEaviation.direct ↗
- Finnair selects SES for E195-E2 onboard connectivityworldairlinenews.com ↗
- Finnair selects SES for E195-E2 onboard connectivityaerotelegraph.com ↗
- Cebu Pacific deploys five electric GSE units at Davao Airportaviationpros.com ↗
- NetJets plans Columbus headquarters expansionaerotime.aero ↗
- Boeing certified three engine options for the 747-400simpleflying.com ↗
- PIA appoints Adrian Hamilton-Manns as chief executiveflightglobal.com ↗